Bangladesh built 9,394 digital centers and launched dozens of portals. Yet citizens still pay brokers 10-25x official fees. Here's why these systems fail and the proven solutions that can actually work.
wt
In September 2023, Bangladesh's National ID server shut down for 48 hours. No explanation. No alternative process. Millions of citizens needing NID verification for essential services—bank accounts, SIM cards, government benefits—were simply stuck.
This wasn't an isolated incident. The e-TIN system crashed during tax season. The birth registration portal exposed millions of citizens' personal data. The e-passport system, promised to be "fast and hassle-free," took 2-6 months instead of the advertised 7-10 days.
Here's what happened next: citizens went to brokers. The same "dalals" (দালাল) that digital portals were supposed to eliminate. They paid 10-25 times the official fees. And the system continued exactly as before—except now with a digital facade.
Bangladesh ranks 151st out of 180 countries in the 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index (score: 23/100—lowest in 13 years). Despite building 9,394 Union Digital Centres and launching dozens of e-governance portals, the broker ecosystem thrives. Here's why these systems fail and what actually works.
The Digital Bangladesh vision launched in 2009 with clear goals:
By 2024, the infrastructure looked impressive on paper:
Mesbah Uddin from Gaibandha needed to download a land document. He went to his local Union Digital Centre. The internet was too slow. The document wouldn't download. He had to cross a river by boat—a 2-hour journey each way—to reach a district office. There, he paid a broker 5,000 BDT for a service with an official fee of 500 BDT.
The numbers tell the story:
Citizens aren't choosing brokers because they're lazy or uninformed. They're choosing brokers because the digital systems don't work.
Here's what I've found after analyzing Bangladesh's e-governance failures: the systems were designed by technologists for bureaucrats, not for citizens.
The problems:
A European Union report in November 2024 identified "delivery deficiencies in digital knowledge and e-participation" as critical barriers. The full impact of digital innovations is limited by poor implementation, especially in rural and underserved communities.
September 2023: NID server down for 48 hours
March 2023: E-TIN hardware crash during tax season
August 2023: Birth registration portal suspended after data breach
The pattern is clear: inadequate infrastructure, insufficient data centers, unreliable connectivity, and no backup systems for critical services.
Union Digital Centres report low internet speeds preventing basic tasks like document downloads. Rural areas lack reliable broadband. Power outages disrupt services. And there are no offline alternatives when connectivity fails.
Each ministry develops separate systems without coordination. There's no data sharing between departments. Citizens must interact with multiple systems for related services. No unified digital identity exists.
Want to register land? You need documents from the land office, tax office, and local government—each with its own portal, login system, and requirements. The EU report called this a "fragmented approach to digital initiatives within government agencies."
The skills gap:
The corruption problem:
In July 2024, 90 people were charged with selling civil service exam questions, including 31 named officials. This is the system citizens are supposed to trust with their digital services.
Brokers don't exist because citizens are ignorant. They exist because they solve real problems that the digital systems don't.
What brokers provide:
Why citizens use them:
A 2024 LinkedIn analysis found that middlemen are "actively supported by political parties and bureaucrats" and are "direct beneficiaries of systemic corruption." The broker ecosystem isn't a bug—it's a feature of the current system.
India created 1.3+ billion unique biometric identities. Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT) send subsidies and benefits directly to bank accounts, eliminating intermediaries.
The key difference: Unified digital identity that works across all government services. One authentication system. One database. Interoperability by design.
Estonia provides 99% of public services online 24/7. Only marriage and divorce require physical presence.
What makes it work:
Worth noting: Estonia's population is 1.3 million—manageable scale matters. But the principles apply regardless of size.
Kenya established one-stop service centers for government services with the eCitizen platform for online applications.
The innovation: Transparent process, direct citizen access without middlemen, and reduced bureaucracy. The physical centers provide backup when digital systems fail—a hybrid model Bangladesh lacks.
Rwanda's e-government platform handles birth certificates, passports, and driving licenses with a mobile-first approach.
Why it works: User-friendly, transparent, and designed for smartphone access from the start. Eliminated the need for informal agents by making the official process simpler than the broker alternative.
Treat portal failures as critical infrastructure failures requiring immediate action.
Immediate actions:
Medium-term reforms:
Design principles:
Technical requirements:
Your rights:
Practical steps:
Bangladesh loses an estimated 2-3% of GDP annually to corruption. Citizens pay 10-25x official fees through brokers. Businesses face significant compliance costs. Foreign investment is deterred by corruption perception.
But the human cost is higher. Mesbah Uddin's 4-hour boat journey for a document that should have downloaded in minutes. Hundreds scrambling at passport offices during COVID risks. Millions of citizens' personal data exposed due to poor security.
The interim government (post-August 2024) has an opportunity to reset the e-governance agenda. The infrastructure exists. What's missing is the commitment to make it work for citizens rather than for brokers and corrupt officials.
Success requires five elements working together:
India, Estonia, Kenya, and Rwanda demonstrate that transformation is possible. Bangladesh has the infrastructure foundation. The question is whether political will matches the technical ambition.
Your next step depends on your role:
Bangladesh's e-governance journey doesn't have to be a cautionary tale. It can become a success story—but only if we acknowledge the failures, learn from what works elsewhere, and commit to genuine reform.
The brokers are winning because the portals are failing. Fix the portals, and the brokers lose their reason to exist.
Have you experienced Bangladesh's e-governance portals? Share your story in the comments. What worked? What failed? What would you change?
This analysis is based on comprehensive research from 50+ sources including Transparency International Bangladesh, government reports, EU assessments, and citizen experiences documented between 2018-2025. For the full comprehensive research report with detailed sources and methodology, email us at contact@atomictechnium.com
The expert engineering team at Atomic Technium, delivering enterprise-grade cloud, security, and data solutions with atomic precision.
Continue exploring related topics and insights from our blog.
